perhaps the extra troops can use the rooms at the new embassy?

the only difference is that the surge in iraq is more precipitous.

dublin castle part deux

as the green zone becomes dangerous, the government knows less and less of what is going on in the country:

• A second problem is that by necessity Iraqi government officials are surrounded by thicker and thicker blankets of security where they operate, within the strange menagerie of the Green Zone. That prevents them from making their own observations of life in the rest of Baghdad, said Laith Kubba, who was the spokesman for Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari until Mr. Jaafari left office in early 2006.
• “The gap has gone too wide,” Mr. Kubba said. “Many of those people have insulated themselves from what’s out on the streets.” ("In the Heat of Battle and Politics, the Hard Facts Melt," By JAMES GLANZ, May 20, 2007, New York Times)

perhaps the saigon embassy (above
, 1970) is the operative comparison (baghdad embassy in construction above)?

baghdad embassy or dublin castle?

the usa is building the biggest embassy in the world in baghdad. it is increasingly unclear what diplomatic or ambassardorial functions will take place in a country which this week saw (1) signs that the iraqi parliament was becoming irrelevant to any day-to-day activities on the ground; (2) a new high in civilian contractor/mercenary deaths; (3) steady numbers of journalists killed or abducted in iraq; and (4) grim assessments from the us military.

• The new U.S. Embassy in Baghdad will be the world's largest and most expensive foreign mission, though it may not be large enough or secure enough to cope with the chaos in Iraq....
• The $592 million embassy occupies a chunk of prime real estate two-thirds the size of Washington's National Mall, with desk space for about 1,000 people behind high, blast-resistant walls. The compound is a symbol both of how much the United States has invested in Iraq and how the circumstances of its involvement are changing....
• The 21-building complex on the Tigris River was envisioned three years ago partly as a headquarters for the democratic expansion in the Middle East that President Bush identified as the organizing principle for foreign policy in his second term.
• The complex quickly could become a white elephant if the U.S. scales back its presence and ambitions in Iraq. Although the U.S. probably will have forces in Iraq for years to come, it is not clear how much of the traditional work of diplomacy can proceed amid the violence and what the future holds for Iraq's government.
• "What you have is a situation in which they are building an embassy without really thinking about what its functions are," said Edward Peck, a former top U.S. diplomat in Iraq.
• "What kind of embassy is it when everybody lives inside and it's blast-proof, and people are running around with helmets and crouching behind sandbags?" ("U.S. Embassy in Iraq to Be Biggest Ever", by ANNE GEARAN | AP | May 19, 2007)

i note in passing that the large, fortified complex that dominated 20th-century dublin was dublin castle, the site of british rule in ireland and the headquarters of the lord lieutenant. a quick view of the movie Michael Collins will show you that all the activity in dublin castle was useless without links to the populace (intelligence, rumors, etc.) which Mr. Collins and the I.R.A. quietly and ruthlessly severed. i am sure that the situation behind the blast-proof walls in baghdad is much different, however, because the policy makers study history. or not?

enemy of victory in iraq?: the U.S. Government

the state department has begun attacking the defense dept. (specifically Paul Brinkley) for opening state businesses and giving jobs to unemployed Iraqis under the all-to-likely assumption that more jobs = less insurgency.

• Paul Brinkley, a deputy undersecretary of defense..., has reopen[ed] dozens of government-owned factories in Iraq....
• Brinkley and his colleagues at the Pentagon believe that rehabilitating shuttered, state-run enterprises could reduce violence by employing tens of thousands of Iraqis. Officials at State counter that the initiative is antithetical to free-market reforms the United States should promote in Iraq.
• The bureaucratic knife fight over the best way to revive Iraq's moribund economy illustrates how the two principal players in the reconstruction of Iraq -- the departments of Defense and State -- remain at odds over basic economic and political measures. The bickering has hamstrung initiatives to promote stability four years after Saddam Hussein's fall....
• The U.S. Agency for International Development estimates that nearly half of Iraqis are unemployed or work fewer than 15 hours a week, but those figures do not include hundreds of thousands who once worked for state-owned enterprises and continue to collect about 40 percent of their original salaries. If they are counted, Brinkley believes, the true figure for unemployed and underemployed Iraqis may approach 70 percent. ("Defense Skirts State in Reviving Iraqi Industry," By Rajiv Chandrasekaran, Washington Post, May 14, 2007; Page A01)

a quick check of the blogs finds this idea attacked from the left and the right. bottom line: great idea, but a little late as now it will just be one more target for the insurgents.